Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's appeal to have an earlier effective date for the addition of his current spouse, I.R., as a dependent was dismissed because it was not timely filed within one year from the April 2016 decision removing T.R. and adding I.R.

The deciding factor: The October 2024 VA Form 10182 NOD did not meet the legal criteria for an appeal due to its untimeliness, as it was submitted more than a year after the April 2016 decision.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 3, 2026
Citation
A26009790

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26009790.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.