The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed mental health condition, as well as whether it is related to his service. The appeal will be remanded for this purpose.
The deciding factor: The evidence indicates a need for a VA examination due to the Veteran's lay statements and post-service psychiatric diagnoses, but no in-service complaints or records of a head injury requiring staples have been provided.
- Claimed conditions
- Mental health condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 3, 2026
- Citation
- A26010019
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A26010019.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a mental health condition, finding no evidence of its onset during active service or any relationship to in-service events.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including back and neck conditions, bilateral foot problems, and a mental health condition, render him unable to maintain gainful employment. The Board has granted the TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking TDIU benefits due to service-connected disabilities. The Board has ordered remand for additional development, including obtaining updated medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.