Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's malignant neoplasms, esophagus, is related to his in-service toxic exposures and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.

The deciding factor: The private medical opinion provided by Dr. D.M. concluded that metastatic esophageal cancer is at least as likely as not related to the Veteran's in-service toxic exposures, including exposure to fumes, nanosized materials, lead dust, and minimal asbestos from his MOS of Gunner's Mate/Armorer.

Claimed conditions
malignant neoplasms, esophagus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 12, 2026
Citation
A26013403

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26013403.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.