The Veteran's appeal regarding a rating for scotoma of the left eye with central retinal artery occlusion is remanded due to inadequate examination and duty-to-assist error.
The deciding factor: The VA examination did not meet the requirements for evaluating visual impairment under VA regulations, leading to an error in assessing the severity of her disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye scotoma, central retinal artery occlusion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 18, 2026
- Citation
- A26014783
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26014783.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer and left eye scotoma was denied. An increased disability rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals of retinal scar of the left eye was also denied, but a separate 10 percent disability rating for left eye postoperative cataract was granted. The issue of entitlement to service connection for left eye glaucoma was remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions and a need for further examination. The Veteran's left eye conditions, other than his service-connected corneal scar, are being evaluated.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty-to-assist error, requiring an examination for the Veteran's left eye condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's eye disabilities, specifically bilateral cataracts, bilateral dry eye with epiphora, bilateral watery eyes, bilateral refractive error, and left eye scotoma.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.