Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has restored service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus and granted service connection for various peripheral neuropathies and a heart disability, all related to the Veteran's exposure to contaminated C-123 aircraft during his military service.

The deciding factor: VA found that the original grant of service connection was based on incorrect presumptive exposure to herbicide agents (Agent Orange) due to the Veteran's duties operating or maintaining contaminated C-123 aircraft, and thus severed service connection. The Board determined this decision was erroneous and restored it.

Claimed conditions
Type II diabetes mellitus, right upper extremity radial nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, right upper extremity median nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, right upper extremity ulnar nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity radial nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity median nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity ulnar nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity sciatic nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity femoral nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity sciatic nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity femoral nerve diabetic peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, kidney disability (diabetic nephropathy and chronic kidney disease), heart disability (myocardial infarction, bradycardia, implanted pacemaker)
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 26, 2026
Citation
A26017809

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26017809.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.