The appeal is remanded to determine if the Veteran requires personal care services, supervision or protection based on symptoms or residuals of neurological impairment, and regular or extensive instruction or supervision without which his ability to function in daily life would be seriously impaired.
The deciding factor: The CEAT's determination that the Veteran does not require personal care services was not fully explained due to a lack of consideration of favorable evidence regarding the Veteran's need for assistance with personal care activities.
- Claimed conditions
- inability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), need for supervision or protection based on symptoms or residuals of neurological or other impairment or injury, need for regular or extensive instruction or supervision without which the ability of the veteran to function in daily life would be seriously impaired
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 4, 2026
- Citation
- A26019458
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26019458.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The appeal is remanded to determine if the Veteran requires personal care services for ADL, supervision or protection based on neurological impairment, or regular instruction due to daily life function issues.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC should be remanded due to insufficient explanation in the April 2021 decision and a need for further medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the AOJ decision on appeal is not adequate to inform a decision on the merits and requires additional clarification and development. Specifically, the AOJ did not provide clear explanation for its conclusion that the Veteran does not need personal care services based on an inability to perform ADLs or have a need for supervision, protection, or instruction.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC should be remanded due to insufficient explanation in the CEAT decision. The AOJ is instructed to obtain a more detailed and thoroughly explained medical opinion from the CEAT.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.