The Board has determined that the Veteran's eligibility for enrollment in the PCAFC is remanded due to inadequate consideration of relevant evidence, including his service-connected disabilities and need for assistance with daily activities.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on insufficient discussion of relevant evidence regarding the Veteran's impairment and need for assistance with daily activities.
- Claimed conditions
- Vision impairment, Impaired gross and fine motor strength, Poor coordination
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 5, 2026
- Citation
- A26019789
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26019789.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for various disorders, including a respiratory disorder, headache disorder, loss of balance/dizziness disorder, vision impairment, neck disorder, shoulder and arm disorders, wrist disorders, hand disorders, feet and toes disorder, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete evidentiary record.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for TBI residuals with short-term memory loss, migraine headaches, hand tremors, and vision impairment as secondary to TBI. The VA examiner found no residual conditions attributable to in-service head trauma.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status has been denied as there is no evidence of a factual need for aid and attendance, nor does he meet the criteria for being considered permanently housebound.
- Granted
The veteran is eligible for special monthly pension based on being housebound due to his age and two disabilities rated at 60 percent disabling. He does not meet the criteria for aid and attendance.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.