Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided to remand the case due to a failure to obtain a TERA memorandum and medical opinion regarding herbicide exposures, as well as a direct causation opinion. The claim will be returned for further development.

The deciding factor: The decision was not made based on service connection theory or exposure basis alone; it was because of the need for additional evidence related to herbicide exposures and direct causation.

Claimed conditions
multiple myeloma
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
March 12, 2026
Citation
A26022687

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A26022687.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.