The Veteran's claim for loss of a child is denied as there is no current disability related to reproductive or genetic impairment.,Service connection for arteriosclerotic heart disease is denied due to lack of in-service event and the absence of cardiovascular disease during active service.,Service connection for diabetes is denied as there is no diagnosis of diabetes at any time during the pendency of the claim.,Service connection for loss of gall bladder is denied as there is no evidence of a disability during or prior to service.,Service connection for loss of spleen is denied as there is no evidence of a disability during or prior to service.,Service connection for nephrolithiasis is denied due to lack of in-service event and the absence of chronic kidney condition at separation.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim for loss of child is based on a miscarriage experienced by his spouse, not related to any current disability. The record does not reflect a current disability of the Veteran related to reproductive or genetic impairment.,There was no in-service event and the most probative evidence does not establish a nexus between arteriosclerotic heart disease and service, including radiation exposure during service.,The Veteran has not been diagnosed with diabetes at any time during the pendency of the claim. The record does not document a current disability of diabetes.,There is no evidence of loss of gall bladder or spleen during or prior to service. The most probative evidence does not establish a nexus between these conditions and service, including radiation exposure.,The Veteran's loss of spleen was due to surgery in 2018, which occurred many years after separation from service. There is no current disability related to service.,Nephrolithiasis preexisted service as evidenced by hospitalization at age 10 and a history of kidney issues prior to service.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of child, arteriosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, loss of gall bladder, loss of spleen, nephrolithiasis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 13, 2026
- Citation
- A26023183
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A26023183.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and kidney disease are being remanded due to the need for VA examinations to determine if these conditions are related to his exposure to contaminants in the water supply at Camp Lejeune during service.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for increased evaluations and service connection were dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's tinnitus and hearing loss claims are denied as there is no current diagnosis of these conditions.,The Veteran's high cholesterol, dementia, stroke, prostate cancer, cataracts, diabetes, hypertension, CHF, and myocardial infarction claims are denied due to lack of service connection evidence or insufficient evidence to establish a nexus between the disabilities and active duty service.,The Veteran was exposed to toxins during his military service but there is no evidence linking these exposures to any of the claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal concerning diabetes and a low back disability has been dismissed due to their death during the pendency of the appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.