The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information about the Veteran's service and a need for an examination to determine if his current ingrown toenail disability is related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was not enough information in the records to ascertain the Veteran's service status, which is necessary to establish service connection. Additionally, the Veteran needs to be examined to assess whether his current condition is related to his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- left great toe ingrown nail, residuals thereof
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 18, 2026
- Citation
- A26024109
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A26024109.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a need for a medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's stroke and its residuals are related to his service in Southwest Asia, given the PACT Act provisions.
- Granted
The Board has granted the appellant's claim for service connection for gastric ulcers and their residuals as secondary to his service-connected GERD. The decision concludes that the current gastric ulcers are caused by and aggravated by his service-connected GERD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer and its residuals is being remanded due to the need for a TERA examination, as well as the need to obtain additional VA and private treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to errors in development and the need for additional medical opinions. The appellant's lipomas are being reviewed again as they may be related to his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.