The Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are remanded due to concerns about the adequacy of VA treatment and potential delays in diagnosis.
The deciding factor: VA medical records indicate appropriate care was provided, but there were concerns about delayed diagnosis and treatment which may have contributed to the Veteran's condition.
- Claimed conditions
- End Stage Renal Failure, Hyperaldosteronism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 20, 2026
- Citation
- A26025505
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26025505.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are remanded due to concerns about the adequacy of medical care provided, including delayed diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are remanded due to concerns about the adequacy of medical care provided, including delayed diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are remanded due to concerns about the adequacy of medical care provided, including delayed diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the remand is necessary to obtain an adequate medical advisory opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's cause of death, specifically whether it was related to his exposure to Agent Orange or Gulf War toxins. The current opinions are insufficient and do not provide a clear determination on these issues.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.