The Board has determined that the VA examination is inadequate and remands the case for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and providing a new opinion regarding the Veteran's eye disorder.
The deciding factor: The VA examination report contains factual errors and does not adequately address the Veteran's claims.
- Claimed conditions
- Traumatic hyphema, Blurred vision
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 26, 2026
- Citation
- A26027549
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26027549.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder with status post stroke and unspecified neurocognitive disorder, speech impairments, bilateral hearing loss, blurred vision, and a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
- Partly granted
The Board granted increased ratings for neuropathy of the right and left lower sciatic nerves, but denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, depleted lung function, hypertension, blurred vision, and coronary artery disease.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examination report from August 2022 was inadequate and remanded for a new examination. The Veteran's TBI residuals, including blurred vision, headaches, fatigue, and sleeplessness, are being reviewed.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services received at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute on May 22, 2014, due to lack of pre-authorization and because the treatment was not provided in an emergency situation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.