Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic sinusitis is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for right leg DVT is denied due to lack of in-service diagnosis or treatment and the absence of a causal relationship between the condition and service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin condition (claimed as PFB) is remanded as there is insufficient medical evidence linking the current condition to service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for visual impairment is remanded due to lack of consideration of his lay statements regarding exposure during service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for dry eye syndrome is remanded due to lack of consideration of his lay statements regarding exposure during service.

The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of chronic sinusitis in the record, and the Board finds that the first element of service connection has not been met.,The Veteran's right leg DVT was diagnosed after service, and there is no evidence linking it to service. The Board finds that the second element of service connection has not been met.,There is insufficient medical evidence to link the current skin condition to service. The third element of service connection has not been met.,The Veteran's lay statements regarding exposure during service were not considered in the VA opinion, and thus the opinion is inadequate. The fourth element of service connection has not been met.,The Veteran's lay statements regarding exposure during service were not considered in the VA opinion, and thus the opinion is inadequate. The fifth element of service connection has not been met.

Claimed conditions
chronic sinusitis, right leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT), skin condition (claimed as pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB)), visual impairment, dry eye syndrome
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 1, 2026
Citation
A26029870

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26029870.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.