The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for service connection for frostbite, bilateral feet should be remanded due to a pre-decisional error in not affording her with a VA examination.
The deciding factor: There was no VA examination conducted on the issue of service connection prior to the decision being made.
- Claimed conditions
- frostbite, bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 2, 2026
- Citation
- A26029985
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26029985.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for frostbite, bilateral feet is reopened and the appeal is granted to this extent only. The case is remanded for a VA examination regarding current bilateral foot disability, to include as residual of cold injury.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for frostbite, bilateral feet was denied as there is no evidence of a current disability related to his active service.,For the initial rating of headaches prior to November 10, 2015, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating. The VA examiner found that he had characteristic prostrating attacks less than once per month.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's frostbite, bilateral feet, was incurred in service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.