The Board dismissed the issue of the reasonableness of agent fees awarded to R.B. based on past-due benefits awarded in a September 2019 Rating Decision due to claims processing defect.
The deciding factor: No party filed a VA Form 10182 within 60 days of the date of the OGC decision, which is required for appeal.
- Claimed conditions
- ED
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 8, 2026
- Citation
- A26032168
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26032168.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty-to-assist error, specifically failing to obtain an opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities contributed to his accidental drowning death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions regarding his diagnosed conditions, including mental health disorders, gastrointestinal issues, respiratory problems, arthritis, neuropathy, sleep apnea, erectile dysfunction, and headaches. The examination will also address whether any of these conditions were caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for irritable bowel syndrome, erectile dysfunction, and sinusitis due to a lack of evidence showing these conditions were incurred or aggravated during his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a bilateral foot disability and erectile dysfunction due to insufficient evidence in the record, including inadequate VA examinations. The appellant is entitled to a new examination to determine if he has any diagnosed disabilities or medically-unexplained chronic multi-symptom illnesses (MUCMI) that are related to his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.