The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 because there was no evidence that the right eye disability resulted from carelessness, negligence, or similar fault on the part of VA personnel.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed that the hypotony and macular folds resulting in the Veteran's right eye condition were a complication of the trabeculectomy procedure, which was performed according to standard of care. The Board found no evidence of substandard care or fault on the part of VA personnel.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Eye Glaucoma, Hypotony Maculopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 21, 2026
- Citation
- A26036806
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A26036806.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person was denied in an August 2021 rating decision. The Board found that legal entitlement to this benefit did not exist prior to February 11, 2019.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a right eye condition, finding no link between the current conditions and service. The Veteran's right eye glaucoma, senile nuclear sclerosis or pseudophakia (status post cataract extraction), and pseudophakia were not shown to have begun during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting evidence regarding whether the Veteran has diabetic retinopathy of his right eye and whether this condition is aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim is not ready for final adjudication and has been remanded to obtain additional medical opinions regarding his right eye disorders.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.