Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal to establish a timely substantive appeal was not received by VA when he filed an October 2019 Notice of Disagreement. The Board is remanding the case for scheduling a DRO review hearing.

The deciding factor: VA did not provide the Veteran with a DRO review hearing as requested in his March 2018 Notice of Disagreement, which violated due process and pre-decisional duty-to-assist error.

Claimed conditions
depression
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 22, 2026
Citation
A26037745

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26037745.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.