The Board has remanded the claims for a VA medical opinion to determine if the Veteran's service-connected bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy resulted in neuritis and/or neuralgia, and whether separate ratings may be appropriate.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the AOJ failed to obtain clarification as to whether the Veteran's bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy resulted in neuritis and/or neuralgia, and if so, whether their symptoms and functional impact can be differentiated from the radiculopathy.
- Claimed conditions
- Neuritis, Neuralgia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 23, 2026
- Citation
- A26038309
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26038309.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted separate 20% disability ratings for moderate neuralgia of the left and right lower extremity popliteal nerves (LLE and RLE neuralgia) effective from December 4, 2021.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for separate compensable disability ratings for neuritis and/or neuralgia in both lower extremities due to potential overlap with existing spinal stenosis diagnoses.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for neuralgia due to maxillary expansion surgery, finding that there is no evidence linking her current condition to her in-service procedure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the previous remand directives were not complied with and a new remand is necessary due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's left jaw pain. The case will be returned for an addendum nexus opinion by a certified neurologist.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.