The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development related to toxic exposure claims, specifically jet fuel and asbestos exposure. The AOJ must determine if the Veteran participated in any TERA (Toxic Exposure Risk Activity) based on his service duties and locations.
The deciding factor: The AOJ failed to consider all potential toxic exposures during the Veteran's service as required by the PACT Act.
- Claimed conditions
- right lung mass, left pulmonary nodules
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 29, 2026
- Citation
- A26040003
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26040003.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for service connection of a right lung mass due to potential exposure to anesthetic gases during active duty.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that there has not been substantial compliance with its prior remand directives and the Veteran's claims for service connection related to Camp Lejeune contaminated water exposure, Agent Orange exposure, and chronic fatigue condition are being remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for fatigue, left shoulder disability, right lung mass, hypertension (HTN), abdominal pain, and bilateral hand and foot numbness due to alleged lead poisoning, exposure to Camp Lejeune contaminated water, and/or Agent Orange. Further development is needed to clarify the nature of these conditions and their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration of the veteran's claims, including a request for an opinion on whether his right lung mass is related to herbicide exposure in service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.