Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
64 vetted Board decisions in 2004
The Board found the veteran not eligible for educational benefits under the VEAP due to his failure to make contributions. The veteran was also denied vocational rehabilitation services as he did not qualify as having an employment handicap.
The Board has granted service connection for allergic rhinitis and assigned a noncompensable evaluation. The issue of entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for gastroesophageal reflux disease with hiatal hernia is denied, as the symptoms do not meet the criteria for a higher rating. The issue of entitlement to a compensable evaluation for a sebaceous cyst excision scar on the mid-back is also denied.
The Board has determined that the appellant does not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance due to his disabilities, as they do not render him helpless or require assistance with daily activities.
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for allergic rhinitis is being remanded due to the submission of new evidence and the need for additional development.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The Board denied a compensable disability evaluation for the veteran's service-connected allergic rhinitis, finding that there was no evidence of 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides or complete obstruction on one side.