Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
497 vetted Board decisions in 2009 — showing the 200 most recent
The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to clarify the relationship between the Veteran's current cervical spine disorder and her service, as well as to address the issue of whether she incurred any other conditions during service.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for posttraumatic osteoarthritis, beriberi, and malnutrition were denied. The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for arteriosclerotic heart disease prior to March 13, 2007 was not granted, nor was his claim for a higher initial evaluation in excess of 60 percent after that date. His claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 30 percent for posttraumatic stress disorder was also denied.
The Veteran's claim for service connection of DJD of the left arm was denied as there is no evidence showing that he has this condition due to his military service. The issue of an increased evaluation for cervical spine disability remains on appeal.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's osteoarthritis of the lumbosacral spine was not incurred in or aggravated by active military service and may not be presumed to have been incurred as a result of service. The preponderance of evidence is against his claim for service connection.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The Board is remanding the case to comply with VCAA requirements and to determine whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the determination that his discharge is a bar to VA benefits.