Asbestosis decisions — 2000

The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for asbestosis and COPD, finding no current medical evidence to support these claims.

The veteran is seeking an increased rating for his service-connected pleural plaques, pleural thickening and effusions with asbestosis. The RO has been instructed to obtain all relevant medical records and schedule the veteran for a VA pulmonary examination to determine the severity of his condition.

The VA determined that the veteran does not have asbestosis, which is a key element for service connection. The claim was denied.

The Board has reopened the claims for service connection for hearing loss and asbestosis, but denied both on the merits due to lack of evidence linking current conditions to military service.

The Board has granted a rating of 60 percent for the veteran's service-connected asbestosis, which is higher than the initial 10 percent assigned.

The Board found that the veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disorder due to asbestos exposure was not well-grounded, as there was no evidence of current disability or link between service and symptoms.

The Board has determined that the veteran's asbestosis is manifested by a Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of 51-64 percent predicted, which meets the criteria for a 60 percent disability rating under the revised rating schedule. The original and revised rating criteria have been applied to determine this effective date.

The Board found no competent evidence to support the veteran's assertions that he had been exposed to asbestos in connection with his service in an artillery unit, and concluded that a well-grounded claim of service connection for asbestosis as due to claimed exposure to asbestos in service has not been presented.

The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for stomach ulcers, asbestosis, and disease processes secondary to exposure to petroleum are not well-grounded.

The Board found that the veteran's claim for service connection for asbestosis, claimed as a result of asbestos exposure, is not well grounded due to lack of evidence of current diagnosis of asbestosis.

The Board found that the veteran's asbestosis is not related to his service and denied his claim for service connection.

The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for low back disability, residuals of asbestos exposure, and residuals of exposure to toxic materials are not well grounded. The claim for service connection for an adjustment disorder is well grounded, and the veteran was granted service connection for dysmenorrhea.

The Board found no medical evidence linking the veteran's current back disability, lead paint exposure-related disabilities, or asbestos exposure-related disability to his period of service. The claims were denied as not well-grounded.

The Board denied a higher evaluation for asbestos-related pleural disease, finding that the veteran's condition did not meet criteria for a rating in excess of 30 percent from July 29, 1996 to October 6, 1996 and did not warrant a rating in excess of 60 percent from October 7, 1996.

The veteran is seeking service connection for asbestosis, which he claims was caused by inservice exposure to asbestos. The claim must be remanded due to the lack of service medical records and relevant post-service medical records.