Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
180 vetted Board decisions in 2004
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to ensure compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 and to obtain necessary medical records. The veteran's claims for service connection, increased rating, and TDIU will be reconsidered based on the new evidence obtained.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of tinea versicolor and denied service connection for this condition. Service connection was also denied for hepatitis C due to lack of evidence.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting examinations to determine the etiology of his left knee disorder and hepatitis C.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis C and an increased rating for PTSD, finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a claim of service connection for hepatitis C and that the current evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating for PTSD.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of hepatitis C is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA and private medical records.