Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
2,954 vetted Board decisions in 2023 — showing the 200 most recent
The Board found that the Veteran's discharge from active military service was not due to willful and persistent misconduct, thus allowing her to receive VA benefits.
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for accurate leg length measurements and an opinion addressing discrepancies in previous measurements.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for rectal polyps and esophageal polyps (Barrett's esophagus) as they are not related to military service or exposure to ionizing radiation.,The VA examiners concluded that there was no link between the Veteran's in-service exposure to nuclear testing sites and his current conditions, with the exception of a possible connection to GERD.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's Graves' disease, specifically addressing his July 1994 ACDUTRA period and whether his symptoms led to a diagnosis of Graves' disease.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents during his service at Fort Gordon, which is necessary for determining whether he was exposed to herbicide agents and thus potentially eligible for service connection for cause of death.