Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
2,954 vetted Board decisions in 2023 — showing the 200 most recent
The Board has found the VA opinions inadequate and remanded for new opinions to assess whether the Veteran's aortic aneurysm is related to his service-connected bladder cancer, if it was aggravated by his service-connected conditions, or if it is caused by trauma sustained during service. The case will be returned to the Board after compliance with appellate procedures.
The Veteran's claim for a compensable disability rating for peripheral retinal lattice degeneration with visual floaters from February 12, 2014 is being remanded due to the need to obtain Social Security Administration (SSA) records related to his claims for Social Security disability benefits.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for trigeminal neuralgia, finding that it did not meet the criteria to establish service connection and was not a MUCMI.
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating higher than 20 percent for rectus diastasis, from April 28, 2014 to the present, is being remanded due to his failure to attend a scheduled VA muscle injuries examination. The case will be rescheduled for a new examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The Veteran's appeal to receive a payment rate of educational assistance benefits greater than 90 percent under the Post-9/11 GI Bill was denied because he only had 1,063 days of qualifying active duty for purposes of calculating his entitlement.