Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
1,704 vetted Board decisions
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current disability for which service connection may be granted, and therefore, the claims are denied. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical opinions regarding the Veteran's right shoulder disorder, sleep apnea, hypertensive vascular disorder, skin disorders, and other issues.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to herbicide agent exposure, including for lymph node cancer and skin cancer. The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder is also being remanded.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for vertigo, respiratory disorder, hypertension, circulatory disorder, skin cancer of the left arm with residual scar, and diabetes mellitus, type II are all denied. The Board found that there is no evidence to support a current diagnosis or relationship between these conditions and military service.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for asthma, skin cancer of the left arm, and diabetes mellitus, type II were also denied as they did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to herbicide agent exposure.
The case is being remanded for further examination to determine the current severity of scars due to skin cancer excisions.
The Board has granted service connection for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and remanded the issue of service connection for Melanoma of the Right Ear.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for malignant melanoma-in-situ of left mid-back and malignant melanoma of right forearm due to a lack of evidence showing in-service incurrence or aggravation of these conditions. The preponderance of the available evidence did not support the Veteran's contention that his skin cancer was related to sun exposure during military service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions of cervical cancer, uterine cancer, malignant melanoma, and endometriosis are not related to her military service. The evidence does not show any in-service events or exposures that could be linked to these conditions.
The Board denied service connection for kidney disease due to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, and remanded the issue of service connection for acral lentigenous melanoma.
The claim of service connection for skin cancer is granted, and the claim of service connection for hypertension is remanded. Service connection for skin cancer is established due to herbicide exposure during service. The claim of service connection for hypertension requires a VA examination to determine if it is related to service.
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 30 percent prior to April 21, 2011 and 70 percent from April 21, 2011 to July 15, 2012. The appeal for prostate cancer and skin cancer remains pending.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for skin cancer is reopened due to new and material evidence, but the issue of whether his current condition is related to herbicide exposure remains pending.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions have been denied as there is no evidence of a relationship between the claimed disabilities and his military service.
The Board has remanded the case due to failure to obtain a VA medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected coronary artery disease (CAD) and presumed in-service exposure to herbicide agents caused or contributed to his death.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient development regarding the Veteran's claimed exposure to ionizing radiation during service. The claim will be processed again with additional evidence and a medical opinion.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to inadequate development and lack of compliance with prior remand orders. The issues include bilateral hearing loss, skin cancer (including scars as residuals), and an acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD).
The Board has denied service connection for retinal disease, hypertension, kidney disease, skin cancer, Parkinson's, and an acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD) as these conditions are not related to service or herbicide exposure.
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and consideration, including obtaining an addendum opinion regarding whether the Veteran's skin cancer was related to his military service.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for arteriosclerotic heart disease, skin cancer of the face and arms, and diabetes mellitus type II have been granted. However, his claims are denied as there is no evidence of herbicide exposure in Thailand.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's skin cancer and its relation to his service. The Veteran needs to provide more information about his treatment, including from SSA, private doctors, and VA providers.
The Veteran's skin cancer was not shown to be related to his service, including exposure to herbicides. The Board denied the claim for service connection.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.