Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
898 vetted Board decisions in 2024 — showing the 200 most recent
The Veteran's claim for higher initial ratings for his service-connected tinea versicolor is remanded due to a duty-to-assist error in not obtaining VA medical treatment records prior to the January 2023 rating decision. A new VA skin examination is needed during an active period of the condition.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for various ankle, elbow, foot, knee, and back disabilities. The appeals were dismissed due to untimely filing of the Notice of Disagreement (VA Form 10182).
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for pseudofolliculitis barbae as there is no current diagnosis of this condition and insufficient evidence to establish an in-service incurrence or continuous symptoms since service.
The Board denied service connection for essential tremor and a skin disability other than tinea unguium, but remanded the claim for respiratory disability.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's case for additional development, including a new VA medical examination and opinion regarding his service-connected guttate psoriasis. The appeal is also remanded to determine if an extraschedular rating is warranted.