Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
478 vetted Board decisions in 2000 — showing the 200 most recent
The Board denied increased ratings for lumbosacral strain and bilateral tinea infections, and declined to reopen a claim for service connection for a heart disorder. The veteran's attorney entered into an agreement in November 1999 but the requirements for payment of attorney fees from past-due benefits have not been met.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for increased disability ratings for his service-connected tinea pedis and pseudofolliculitis barbae are well-grounded, and thus plausible. However, further development is needed as there is insufficient evidence to properly rate these conditions.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for tinea pedis with onychomycosis, tinea versicolor, and tinea cruris due to exposure to Agent Orange. The Board found that there was no medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service or herbicide exposure.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection are well-grounded and have been granted. The veteran is now entitled to service connection for headaches, depression, pseudofolliculitis barbae, hypertension, and a gastrointestinal disorder secondary to medication.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.
The Board denied the appellant's claims for increased ratings and separate evaluations for his service-connected chronic tinea of both feet and hands, finding that the evidence did not support a higher evaluation based on the current symptoms.