Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
12,513 vetted Board decisions for Allergic rhinitis.
The Board has remanded the case for further development and to address the service connection claim for sinusitis. The initial compensable rating claim for allergic rhinitis remains pending.
The Veteran's allergic rhinitis is not manifested by greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides, complete obstruction on one side, or polyps. As such, his claim for a compensable rating for allergic rhinitis is denied.,The Board finds that the August 2014 VA examination for constipation to be inadequate and remands this matter in order to obtain a new VA medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's constipation is related to service or aggravated by major depressive disorder.,The Board finds that the August 2014 VA examination for hemorrhoids to be inadequate and remands this matter in order to obtain a new VA medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's hemorrhoids are related to service.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing or maintaining substantially gainful employment for the appeal period prior to December 2, 2019.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding his claimed conditions and their relationship to service.
The Board has remanded the claims for diabetes mellitus Type II, severe sinus problems, bilateral hearing loss, bilateral tinnitus, right foot injury, and right hip injury due to insufficient development and lack of informed decision.
The Veteran's hearing loss has not been reassessed in over seven years, and he testified that his tinnitus is also a problem. Therefore, another VA examination is needed to assess the severity of his bilateral hearing loss and whether it causes or aggravates his tinnitus.,The Veteran contends that his GERD warrants a higher rating than 10 percent. The most recent examination was in December 2014, which does not account for his current symptoms such as vomiting and esophageal spasm. Another VA examination is needed to reassess the severity of his GERD.,The Veteran contends that he has esophageal spasm associated with his GERD. The most recent examination noted no esophageal spasm at all, but a private record from 2015 diagnosed him with OSA. An additional VA examination is needed to determine whether the esophageal spasm is related to his GERD or instead attributable to another condition.,The Veteran contends that he has obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) due to loud snoring during service. The most recent STRs do not indicate any symptoms of OSA, and a private record from 2015 diagnosed him with OSA. An additional VA examination is needed to determine whether his OSA started in service or is related to another condition.,The Veteran contends that he has congestion, including asthma, rhinitis, and sinusitis, which began during service. The most recent STRs do not indicate any symptoms of these conditions, but a private record from 2014 diagnosed him with allergic rhinitis. An additional VA examination is needed to determine whether his current condition is related to service or another condition.
The Board has remanded the case due to unclear opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's respiratory condition, specifically allergic rhinitis. The examiner needs to provide a rationale for their opinion and clarify whether the Veteran's symptoms align with how allergic rhinitis is known to develop.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination for respiratory conditions, including sinusitis and allergic rhinitis. The Veteran's symptoms have been noted since service and continue today.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, allergic rhinitis, and bilateral hearing loss have been granted. The claim for service connection for hypertension has been denied.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea is related to his service-connected allergic rhinitis, and thus grants service connection for this condition as secondary to his service-connected condition.
The Veteran's claims for an increased rating for allergic rhinitis and service connection for residuals of a head injury were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a compensable disability rating for allergic rhinitis, as there was no greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides or complete obstruction on one side. For the head injury claim, the Veteran's service treatment records noted head injuries but the VA examiners concluded he does not have residuals from any head injury.
The Veteran's claims for allergic rhinitis and dermatosis, both claimed as Gulf War Syndrome, are granted. The claim for Gulf War Syndrome is denied.
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection of allergic rhinitis, headaches, and sinusitis were denied as there was no clear and unmistakable error in the prior rating decisions.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to new evidence submitted after a Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC).
The Board has determined that the Veteran's allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis began during his active military service and have persisted since separation. The evidence supports this finding, including VA and private treatment records.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to a lack of VA efforts in obtaining private medical records from Sleep Diagnostics and an inadequate examination regarding the Veteran's rhinitis disability. The AOJ is required to obtain these records and provide an addendum opinion addressing whether the current rhinitis disability is related to in-service exposure to burn pits, as well as the importance of the fact that the disability was diagnosed decades after service.
The Veteran's allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, diabetes, and thyroid disability are all granted as service-connected due to exposure to jet fuel during active duty. The claims for chronic bronchitis, hypertension, and back disability are remanded.
The Board has denied service connection for diverticulosis and remanded other issues related to sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, GERD, an acquired psychiatric disability, erectile dysfunction, hypertension, and sleep apnea.
The Veteran's headaches are granted as service connected. The claims for acquired psychiatric disorder, bilateral foot disability, respiratory disorder, sleep disorder, and low back disability are remanded due to the need for additional evidence and examination.
The Veteran's claimed allergic rhinitis was not shown to be related to service and the VA examiner found no evidence of chronicity.
← Back to Allergic rhinitis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.