Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
2,885 vetted Board decisions for Bladder cancer.
The Board found that the veteran's cystectomy was not caused by VA medical fault or unforeseen event, and thus denied his claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The veteran's application for Service Disabled Veterans Insurance (RH) was denied because he did not meet the standard of 'good health' as defined by VA guidelines, due to his non-service-connected conditions including heart disease, COPD, and bladder cancer.
The Board has dismissed the appeal regarding an increased rating for service-connected genitourinary disability due to withdrawal by the veteran. The claim of secondary service connection for bladder cancer is denied as there is no evidence that the bladder cancer is proximately due to or the result of the service-connected genitourinary disability.
The veteran's bladder cancer was not manifested in service or within the first post-service year, and there is no evidence to support a connection between his current condition and his military service. The claim for service connection for bladder cancer is denied.
The veteran's bladder cancer is being remanded for further evaluation to determine if it was caused by his exposure to herbicides and/or petroleum products during service.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information and need for further medical opinions. The appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death is being reviewed, as well as a claim for accrued benefits related to bladder cancer.
The veteran is seeking service connection for urinary bladder cancer, which he contends is due to exposure to ionizing radiation in service. The case requires further development under VA regulations.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bladder cancer and prostate cancer, finding no evidence of a link between these conditions and his military service.
The Board found that the veteran's bladder cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, nor may it be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated due to exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence did not establish a connection between the veteran's bladder cancer and his military service.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including scheduling a videoconference personal hearing for the appellant.
The Board determined that the veteran's service-connected disabilities did not cause or contribute to his death, and denied the claim of entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The Board found that neither a service-connected disability nor active service, including the veteran's radiation exposure, is the principal or contributory cause of his death. The veteran died from metastatic bladder cancer.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disorder and bladder cancer, both linked to inservice asbestos exposure. The evidence did not establish a direct link between the conditions and service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's bladder cancer was not incurred or aggravated by service, and may not be presumed to have been incurred in service due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The claim is denied.
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of diabetes mellitus, type II; kidney cancer; bladder cancer; or macular degeneration in service or for many years thereafter, and no competent evidence of a nexus between these disorders and his period of active service. Therefore, the claims for service connection for these conditions are denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's death from metastatic bladder cancer was incurred in service due to asbestos exposure, and thus grants service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and requests for additional information from various sources.
The veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of genitourinary tract cancer, including bladder cancer, was denied. However, his initial increased evaluation for prostate cancer was granted and currently rated at 10 percent.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bladder cancer and an increased rating for diabetes mellitus. The decision found that there was no evidence of a nexus between the veteran's current conditions and his military service, including exposure to herbicides.
The Board found that the veteran's prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and colon polyps were not present in service or related to service. The claim for service connection was denied.
← Back to Bladder cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.