Diabetes decisions — 2011
1,672 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining records from various sources and scheduling VA examinations. The Veteran's claims are currently pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · September 2011
The Board has remanded the claim due to insufficient evidence, including a questionable military retirement examination report that may have been altered. The Veteran's service connection claim for Type II Diabetes Mellitus and associated peripheral neuropathy is being reviewed again with additional efforts to obtain missing STRs and a VA medical opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his previously denied claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated by service, including as due to herbicide exposure in Korea. The Board found the evidence insufficient to establish service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · September 2011
The Veteran's coronary artery disease, which is presumed to be due to exposure to herbicides in service, is granted as service connected. The secondary service connection for diabetes mellitus is also granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including verifying periods of active duty and inactive duty training, obtaining medical records from SSA, and providing updated opinions regarding the onset and relationship of the Veteran's current disabilities to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension is not service-connected, either on a direct basis or as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II and coronary artery disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities, and erectile dysfunction as secondary to diabetes mellitus. The Veteran's claims for hypertension and diabetic eye disability are pending.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as he withdrew his appeal before the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board finds that the appellant does not meet the criteria for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of the right upper extremity and/or the right foot due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran is in need of regular aid and attendance due to his service-connected conditions, including PTSD with dysthymic disorder, dumping syndrome, and other disabilities. The Board has granted special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims to reopen his service connection applications for right hip disability, left hip disability, bilateral knee disability, residuals of cold injury (feet), and diabetes mellitus. The appeal is based on new evidence that raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case due to additional evidence received by the Veteran, and the RO is instructed to consider this new evidence in its adjudication of the claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has determined that the claimant's service connection claims are inextricably intertwined with his diabetes mellitus claim. Therefore, all issues related to secondary service connection for erectile dysfunction, depression, hypertension, peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, and diabetic retinopathy will be remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration, including obtaining medical opinions regarding whether VA treatment caused or contributed to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for PTSD and remanded the underlying claim for diabetes mellitus. The Veteran's PTSD claim is granted, while the diabetes mellitus claim requires further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and verifying herbicide exposure. The Veteran's claims for service connection will be readjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's TDIU claim has been granted due to his service-connected disabilities making him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's right and left lower extremity diabetic neuropathy are currently rated at 20 percent each, effective February 28, 2002. The Veteran's diabetic retinopathy is currently rated at 10 percent, effective April 12, 2004.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's Type II diabetes mellitus is presumed to be due to his in-service exposure to herbicides, specifically Agent Orange. The Board has granted service connection for this condition.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.