Diabetes decisions — 2011
1,672 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's original claim of service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied in April 2004 due to lack of evidence showing exposure to herbicides. The Board found no new and material evidence since the previous denial.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board found no evidence to support service connection for diabetes mellitus or shortness of breath, and thus denied both claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's service-connected right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy is rated at 10 percent, but the claims for gastroparesis and hypertension are denied as not related to service or due to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board denied service connection for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and muscle breakdown as they were not permanently worsened by the appellant's reserve duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, including as due to herbicide exposure, is denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not have active service in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era and was not exposed to herbicides while on active duty, thus precluding presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, peripheral neuropathy, and multiple myeloma were denied as these conditions are not presumed to have been incurred due to his alleged exposure to herbicides during service. The Board found that the first evidence of these conditions is decades after service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for diabetes, left eye blindness, and a back disorder due to lack of current diagnoses and insufficient evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Board finds that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is etiologically related to his period of active service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including broken teeth, migraine headaches, head injury, dislocated shoulder, hip arthritis, knee arthritis, nose and jaw injuries, diabetes mellitus, thyroid issues, lung problems, throat issues, breathing problems, allergies, gum bleeding, loss of smell/taste, sleep apnea, swallowing problems (dysphagia), blepharitis, ulcers, chronic fatigue syndrome, psychiatric disorders, fear of heights, memory problems, and insomnia are not supported by the evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's TDIU claim was denied as his service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's diabetic retinopathy with bilateral cataracts has not met the criteria for a compensable disability rating under either the old or revised VA rating criteria. The Veteran does not have impairment of central visual acuity that would warrant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's current Type II diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated by service, and its incurrence or aggravation during active service may not be presumed. The appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, peripheral neuropathy of upper and lower extremities, and hypertension were not incurred in or aggravated by service, including exposure to Agent Orange. The presumptive provisions for these conditions have not been met.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus and its related complications, including genitourinary disorders, bilateral lower extremity pain (peripheral neuropathy), vision loss, and anemia. The Veteran's right knee disorder is also now considered service-connected as secondary to his left knee disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at a higher than 20 percent level, and the claim for service connection of PTSD is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for high cholesterol has been denied as it is not a compensable disability.,Service connection has been reopened for bilateral athlete's foot, but the issue remains pending and will be addressed in the remand portion of this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Veteran's cause of death, acute myocardial infarction, was not found to be service-connected.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2011
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of cerebrovascular accident as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus Type II and has also granted TDIU based on the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including his diabetes and cerebrovascular accidents.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2011
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection and increased rating, including secondary to hypertension. The case is now pending with the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board has denied the appellant's claim for special monthly compensation based on need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound due to her failure to cooperate with VA examinations and lack of good cause for missing scheduled appointments.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.