Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, and his diabetic neuropathy of the feet warrants separate 10 percent ratings. The Veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 50 percent, which is the maximum schedular rating available.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's hypertension is found to be at least as likely as not caused by or a result of his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Veteran does not have PTSD due to uncorroborated claimed stressors. Service connection for coronary artery disease with myocardial infarction, secondary to DM, is granted since July 9, 2001.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Board has granted service connection for hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, pernicious anemia, and polymyositis based on exposure to ionizing radiation in service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diabetes mellitus is secondary to his service-connected low back disability, and thus grants the claim for service connection on a secondary basis.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, was denied increased ratings prior to November 5, 2003 and from that date forward. The Board found the evidence did not meet the criteria for a rating greater than 40 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and a stroke are being remanded due to the need for additional records from VA facilities in Michigan, Social Security Administration records related to his disability benefits claim, and any other relevant evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II was not present during service and there is no evidence linking it to service. The Board denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was not incurred in or aggravated by service, including exposure to herbicide agents. Service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's current flushing syndrome and associated symptoms are secondary to his contamination during service with jet engine fuel.,Diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hypertension, osteopenia, and obstructive sleep apnea are all secondary to the Veteran's service-connected flushing syndrome.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus was treated solely by exercise and a restricted diet for the period from June 10, 2005, to May 29, 2008. For the period beginning May 30, 2008, he began taking metformin but his activities were not regulated.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has determined that the appellant's claim of entitlement to service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death must be remanded due to incomplete notification and missing medical records. The VA will need to provide proper VCAA notice, obtain terminal hospital reports, and seek a medical opinion regarding whether any fatal cardiovascular or pulmonary disorder had its onset during the Veteran's period of military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred on March 7, 2008 for emergency treatment of difficulty breathing and trouble swallowing are approved due to the severity of his service-connected heart disease and diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus is being remanded due to the need to obtain additional service records and provide a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2009
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · December 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and residuals to include amputation of the left leg secondary to herbicide exposure is being remanded due to inadequate development regarding his alleged exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board has remanded several claims for additional development, including the Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical services provided by University Community Hospital of Tampa, Florida. The appeal is currently pending and denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's timely substantive appeal was not received within one year of the September 2005 rating decision, thus denying his claims for service connection. The claim is reopened due to new and material evidence submitted since the September 2005 rating decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's claim for a total rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities was granted effective from May 22, 2006. The Board found that the evidence did not show an earlier date when he became unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2009
The appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant and his authorized representative.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes, hypertension, erectile dysfunction, and amputation of right toes did not have onset during service or within one year of separation from service. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to his active service including as due to any exposure to Agent Orange.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.