Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, based on the presumption of exposure to herbicide agents during service. The Veteran's ischemic heart disease and hypertension are not addressed as they were not part of the original claim.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to scheduling issues for a Board hearing. Service connection claims for various conditions are pending.
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for labyrinthitis is denied as the maximum schedular rating has been assigned.,The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus with carotid artery disease from October 18, 2005 is denied as the criteria for a higher rating have not been met.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and evaluations, particularly regarding his COPD and diabetes mellitus.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the current severity of his diabetes mellitus.
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's heart condition as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, Type II. The issues of hypertension and diabetic retinopathy with cataracts are addressed in the REMAND portion of this decision.
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is caused by or worsened beyond natural progression as a consequence of his service-connected diabetes mellitus and PTSD.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his request for a hearing before the Board. The case will be returned to the RO for further action.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on multiple issues, including bilateral knee disability, right ankle disability, diabetes, umbilical and hiatal hernia, and periodontal disease, was granted. The decision also includes a grant of TDIU.
The Board found no current diagnosis of diabetes, left ear disability, or lumbar spine disability. The Veteran's service treatment records did not show any findings related to these conditions. There is insufficient evidence linking any current disabilities to service.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy were denied. The Board found that the criteria for higher ratings had not been met during the relevant periods.
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2, finding that the Veteran was exposed to Agent Orange during active military service and therefore presumptively presumed to have been incurred in service.
The Veteran's service records do not show exposure to Agent Orange or any other herbicide. His diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy are not shown to be related to his military service, including any potential exposure to herbicides.
The Veteran's sinusitis with allergic rhinitis is rated at 30 percent, and his diabetes mellitus is rated at 30 percent.
The Veteran's type 2 diabetes mellitus is presumed to have been incurred as a result of his Vietnam service. The physician provided medical evidence that the Veteran's elevated blood sugar levels due to his diabetes mellitus contributed substantially to his death from sepsis shock following a stem cell transplant.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling examinations.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, type II are service connected due to exposure to herbicide agents during his active duty in Vietnam.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and hypertension are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining relevant medical records and providing a VA examination.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent disabling and does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.