Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The veteran's claim for service connection for Type II Diabetes Mellitus was reopened based on new and material evidence, and the Board granted service connection.
The Board denied an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for bilateral hearing loss disability prior to January 2009 and a compensable evaluation thereafter, but did not restore the 20 percent rating from January 1, 2009.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of exposure to herbicides and no direct link between the condition and military service.
The veteran withdrew his appeals for earlier effective dates of service connection for type II diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied as the evidence did not support higher evaluations or additional service-connected benefits.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus type II and arterial hypertension are being remanded for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of these conditions.
The veteran's hypertension was rated at 10 percent, and the claims for a compensable rating for diabetic retinopathy and an increased evaluation for diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction were denied.
The veteran's claim for a higher initial rating for diabetes mellitus is being remanded to schedule him for a VA examination and obtain any additional medical records.
The appeal is remanded to the RO for scheduling a Travel Board hearing.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and prostate cancer, as there was no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides or ionizing radiation, and the medical evidence did not establish a link between the claimed conditions and his military service.
The veteran's hypertension was not incurred in, or aggravated by, active service and is not related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The veteran is entitled to a 20 percent rating for diabetes mellitus prior to April 23, 2005.
The Board found that the evidence of record did not establish that the awards of service connection for type II diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy were clearly and unmistakably erroneous, thus severing these awards was improper.
The veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and a right knee disorder were denied as there was no evidence of current disabilities, and the in-service complaints did not result in chronic conditions.
The veteran does not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based on the need of regular aid and attendance or being housebound due to his disabilities.
The Board has reopened the claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and a skin disorder claimed as a residual of exposure to Agent Orange. However, it has denied service connection for hypertension, erectile dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, and PTSD.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased disability ratings and TDIU, finding that the evidence did not support higher ratings or unemployability.
The veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities were denied as the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 20% for DM or ratings greater than 10% prior to August 2006, and no more than 30% since that date.
The veteran's type II diabetes mellitus was not incurred in or aggravated by service, nor may it be presumed to have been incurred therein.
The veteran's lumbar spine DDD, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease in the left lower extremity, and erectile dysfunction were not found to warrant higher initial ratings.
The Board denied the veteran's appeal for a higher rating for diabetes mellitus, as the evidence did not support an evaluation in excess of 20 percent.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.