Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating or service connection for any of the conditions on appeal.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's service connection claim for Type II diabetes was denied, while he was granted entitlement to receipt of VA outpatient dental treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The Board remands the claims for further development, including a VA examination for the right shoulder and an opinion on the etiology of diabetes.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's adult onset diabetes mellitus is due to herbicide exposure in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The Board remands the claims for service connection for PTSD and type II diabetes mellitus to obtain additional evidence, including VA treatment records and potentially missing service records.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's diabetes mellitus does not require regulation of activities, and there is no evidence of a kidney disability. Therefore, the claims for an increased rating for diabetes and service connection for a kidney disability have been denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus type II and denied service connection for coronary artery disease, essential hypertension, retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy of both upper and lower extremities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claims for a compensable rating for tinea pedis and service connection for diabetes mellitus are being remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claims for service connection for schizophrenia, degenerative disc disease of the spine, and diabetes mellitus type 2 were denied due to a lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for Type I diabetes mellitus as there is no evidence linking the condition to active duty or ACDUTRA.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's diabetes mellitus was rated at 40 percent prior to February 12, 2007, and increased to 100 percent as of that date due to the severity of his symptoms.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded for further evidentiary development and medical opinions regarding the veteran's eye disorder and hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2008
The veteran withdrew his appeal on all the issues listed.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2008
The veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions are denied as the evidence does not support a finding of in-service injury or disease, and no current disability is shown.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2008
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2008
The Board denied service connection for Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart disability, both claimed due to exposure to Agent Orange. The veteran did not have documented service in the Republic of Vietnam, nor was he exposed to herbicides there. There is no evidence of these conditions during or within one year after service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2008
The veteran is granted service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity (secondary to diabetes), and erectile dysfunction (secondary to diabetes) with effective dates starting from June 5, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bronchitis, Graves disease, diabetes mellitus (claimed as secondary to Graves disease), heart disease (claimed as secondary to Graves disease), and residuals of injuries of the eyes, to include loss of vision. The reasons were that these conditions did not manifest during active service or are not related to any in-service event.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2008
The Board has remanded the issues of hypertension and arthritis for further development. The status of hypertension is unknown, while the arthritis issue requires additional medical examination to determine if it is related to service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.