Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus, which was initially granted service connection for in December 2001 and rated at 20 percent, does not warrant a higher rating since it only requires daily insulin treatments and dietary restrictions without needing regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2007
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding new and material evidence. The veteran served in Vietnam and was diagnosed with diabetes prior to his military service.,Service connection is granted for additional disabilities (retinopathy, cataracts, neuropathy, kidney failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease, vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, erectile dysfunction, foot problems, skin conditions) as secondary to the veteran's pre-existing diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board found that the veteran's diabetes mellitus does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation than 40 percent, and his hypertension with proteinuria is evaluated at 30 percent under renal involvement in diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and issuing a supplemental statement of the case (SOC) for certain issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation than 40 percent, effective May 8, 2001.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2007
The veteran's appeal for service connection for diabetic retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy has been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2007
The Board has dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of his appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for his service-connected diabetic retinopathy is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and proper VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining an opinion from a VA endocrinologist regarding the effect of cortisone injections on the veteran's diabetes mellitus and whether the service-connected low back disability increased the severity of his diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, a bilateral eye disorder, erectile dysfunction, alcohol abuse, and drug abuse. The appeals were based on presumed exposure to herbicides during service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a stroke, PTSD, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, skin disability and impotence are all denied.,There is no current evidence of any disabilities related to the conditions claimed.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's heart disorder is proximately due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II, and thus grants the claim for secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus type II, bilateral eye disability, heart disease, hypertension, arthritis, COPD, dental condition, and colitis, were denied as they are not considered radiogenic diseases or presumptively related to exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's claims for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus with early diabetic nephropathy and erectile dysfunction were denied, as was his claim to reopen a knee disability. His service connection claim for hammertoes was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus, prostatitis, and gout. The veteran was assigned a 20% evaluation for diabetes mellitus effective April 2, 2001. He is not entitled to an increased rating for his prostatitis or gout.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board has granted a higher disability rating of 10 percent for chronic right and left leg ulcers secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus. The veteran's death was not caused by or substantially contributed to by his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The veteran's death was caused by diabetes mellitus, which is presumed to have been caused by his service in Vietnam and exposure to Agent Orange. The Board granted service connection for the cause of the veteran's death based on this presumption.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for cardiovascular disability, diabetes mellitus, erectile dysfunction, and peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, all claimed as secondary to exposure to herbicides. The evidence did not support a finding that the veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information and procedural errors, including a lack of proper notification under the VCAA.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's appeal involves claims for service connection and increased ratings for erectile dysfunction and diabetes mellitus. The Board has remanded the case to obtain clarifying opinions regarding the relationship between these conditions, as well as a reevaluation of his diabetes mellitus.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.