Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's initial rating for diabetes mellitus, type II, from January 26, 1999, to February 12, 2003, was denied as the criteria for a higher rating were not met.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of both lower extremities (claimed as residuals of frostbite) and granted it. The Board also found that diabetes mellitus was incurred in service, with a rating assigned at 100%.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's cause of death, cerebrovascular disease, was not service-connected as it is not shown to have had its onset in service or within one year after separation. The veteran's diabetes mellitus was also not shown in service or within one year after separation and is not related to any incident of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, chloracne, and colon cancer, all secondary to herbicide exposure. The claim for reopening the previously-denied claim of service connection for colon cancer was also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to missing VA clinical records from the Montgomery, Alabama facility. The claims will be reconsidered based on a review of all available evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, low back disability, degenerative joint disease of the knees, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus. The appeals were based on direct evidence rather than a presumption or secondary to another condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The VA denied the veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding that he did not serve in Vietnam and thus could not be presumed to have been exposed to Agent Orange. The Board also found no evidence linking his DM to any incident of military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to service-connected disabilities is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and arranging for the veteran to undergo VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral foot disorders and diabetes mellitus type II, finding that the veteran's current conditions are at least as likely as not secondary to his in-service foot problems. The effective date of the grant of service connection is set at December 21, 1995.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board found that none of the conditions causing the veteran's death were service-connected.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to the veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus type II, which is associated with herbicide exposure. The initial disability rating of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus type II remains unchanged.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board finds that the veteran's diabetes mellitus warrants a disability rating of 60 percent, reflecting episodes of hypoglycemic reactions requiring one or two hospitalizations per year or visits to a diabetic care provider twice a month.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and hypertension were denied as there was no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides or other causative factors.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board found that it was not factually ascertainable prior to November 16, 2004 that the veteran was permanently and totally disabled due to his service-connected conditions. Therefore, the effective date for non-service-connected disability pension cannot be earlier than November 16, 2004.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for restrictive lung disorder with dyspnea on exertion and fibromyalgia, both claimed as due to Agent Orange exposure. The appeals were remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated as 20 percent disabling, and the Board finds that the disability picture does not more closely approximate the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and prostate disability, finding that there was no evidence of in-service exposure to ionizing radiation or mustard gas. The preponderance of the evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine, and hypertension. The evidence did not show that these conditions were incurred or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for systemic lupus erythematosus and denied her claims for seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes mellitus, and cholecystitis status post cholectectomy.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for diabetes mellitus was denied, and the current claim for an increased rating since September 25, 2003 also failed to meet the criteria.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.