Erectile dysfunction Board decisions
21,351 indexed Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has granted a 30 percent evaluation for PTSD from June 14, 2001. The veteran's service-connected PTSD affects him to such an extent that he experiences total occupational and social impairment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development and to cure a procedural defect. The RO must ensure all VCAA notice obligations have been satisfied, provide the veteran with an orthopedic examination, and readjudicate the issues on appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence and clarification of the evidence. The case is now remanded for several actions, including obtaining medical records from the VA Medical Center in Montgomery, Alabama, and scheduling the veteran for various examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2003
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected atrophy of the right testicle with loss of function does not warrant a compensable disability rating. The claim for erectile dysfunction was remanded due to inadequate examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of an injury to his penis, finding that there is no evidence linking any current disability to service. The issue of PTSD was also addressed and granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The Board found that the veteran's erectile dysfunction was not established as a consequence of the July 2, 1996 surgery at VA medical facility. The evidence did not establish additional disability resulting from the procedure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2003
The veteran is seeking service connection for a pulmonary disorder, glaucoma with cataracts, and erectile dysfunction. The case has been remanded due to the need for additional development regarding the veteran's participation in Project SHAD.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2003
The appeal has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew their appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected erectile dysfunction does not warrant an initial compensable evaluation, and his PTSD is currently evaluated as 30 percent disabling. The appeal for a higher rating for PTSD is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2003
The veteran has been granted service connection for fatigue and a skin rash as chronic disabilities resulting from an undiagnosed illness due to service in the Southwest Asia theater during the Persian Gulf War. The examiner found that these symptoms are related to undiagnosed illness.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The veteran's case is being remanded for a Travel Board hearing. The issues of entitlement to service connection for skin rash and the evaluation of diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction from April 23, 2002 are pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2003
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction and determined that the veteran's current erectile dysfunction is secondary to his service-connected major depression. The issue of a higher rating for hepatitis B and C remains on appeal.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2003
The veteran withdrew his appeal for the issues listed on the front page of this decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2003
The case is being remanded for further development and examination to determine the validity of the veteran's claims, including a left shoulder disability, erectile dysfunction, and headache disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2003
The Board has granted a 20% evaluation for the service-connected erectile dysfunction of the penis and found that the veteran's balanitis is secondary to his service-connected hypertension. The decision also notes that some criteria for a higher rating are met, but does not specify an effective date.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2003
The veteran's disabilities, while disabling, do not meet the criteria for a permanent and total disability rating for nonservice-connected pension purposes due to their combined rating of 60 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2003
The VA has determined that the appellant's male erectile disorder does not warrant a compensable rating, as his current treatment with testosterone and Viagra allows him to achieve good quality erections.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2003
The Board found that the veteran did not incur additional disability involving scarring on the right side of the throat, sexual dysfunction and/or a hernia due to VA medical treatment in October and November 1997.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings, finding no new evidence to reopen his peptic ulcer disease claim. The nerve damage affecting extremities was not shown to be related to service or a service-connected condition. Erectile dysfunction and memory loss with hearing impairment were also not found to be service-connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection of erectile dysfunction secondary to his service-connected erythema multiforme and an increased rating for his service-connected erythema multiforme.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.