Erectile dysfunction Board decisions
21,351 indexed Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2002
The Board denied the veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for erectile dysfunction as a result of VA left inguinal hernia surgery, finding that there was no evidence to support a relationship between the surgeries and the veteran's erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2002
The veteran's disabilities do not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based on need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction, finding that his condition did not meet or approximate the criteria for a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2001
The veteran's arthritis of the hands and right elbow is service-connected, as are his complaints of pain and numbness above the knees. The Board finds that ED (impotence) is secondary to his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2001
The Board finds that the veteran's current disability does not warrant a rating higher than the currently assigned 20 percent for limitation of motion of lumbar spine with history of herniated disc syndrome.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2001
The veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 40 percent, and he seeks a higher rating. The Board finds that the current disability picture does not warrant an evaluation in excess of 40 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2001
The veteran's sarcoidosis was granted a 60% disability rating as of June 8, 1998. The RO denied service connection for hypertension on secondary basis and the February 1992 decision denying lung condition was not found to be clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2001
The veteran's disabilities do not meet the criteria for special monthly pension benefits based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person or being housebound.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2001
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection and special monthly compensation due to lack of evidence showing entitlement prior to November 7, 1996.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board found that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and thus denied the claim for service connection for cause of death.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to perform daily functions of self-care and protect himself from hazards, warranting special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The veteran's claim for a compensable rating for postoperative residuals of prostate cancer is denied as there are no current active or symptomatic residuals, including voiding dysfunction and erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability is rated at 30 percent, and his impotency is considered secondary to the service-connected lumbar spine disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The Board has determined that a compensable evaluation for low testosterone and erectile dysfunction without penis deformity is not warranted.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2001
The RO granted a 40 percent rating for prostate cancer and a noncompensable rating for erectile dysfunction, effective October 15, 1998. The veteran's claim for higher ratings remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2001
The veteran's erectile dysfunction, status postoperative penile prosthesis is not rated compensable. However, he is granted special monthly compensation due to loss of use of a creative organ.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's loss of erectile power, secondary to prostate cancer, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under the applicable VA disability evaluation guidelines.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for residuals of prostate cancer and a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction. Service connection was granted for hypertension with end-organ damage and segmental glomerulosclerosis secondary to hypertension, but the veteran is not entitled to additional compensation due to his existing service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2001
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The Board found that the veteran's psychiatric disorder is not well grounded, as there is no evidence linking it to service.,The veteran's erectile dysfunction claim was found to be well grounded. The VA examiner opined that his current erectile dysfunction is multifactorial and related to spinal cord injury, mumps orchitis, schizophrenia, and medications for schizophrenia.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.