Glaucoma decisions — 2001
48 indexed Board decisions in 2001.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2001
The veteran's claims for service connection were denied. The Board found that the conditions did not meet the criteria for service connection due to lack of evidence supporting their onset during active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2001
The veteran's right eye disability, including visual loss, cystoid macular edema, and secondary glaucoma, is deemed to be a result of multiple VA surgeries. The Board finds that the veteran did indeed sustain an increase in his right eye disability due to these procedures and grants compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for aid and attendance of another person or at the housebound rate due to insufficient evidence showing he requires such assistance.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2001
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus and glaucoma with cataracts, finding that the veteran's preexisting conditions were aggravated by his active duty service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's tension headaches, which began during his service in the Persian Gulf, are related to his active military service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for cataracts, ocular hypertension (versus glaucoma), and a neuropsychiatric condition as secondary to his service-connected hypertension. The claim for an increased evaluation for hypertension was granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The effective date of the rating decision was not addressed.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The Board found that service connection for ocular hypertension (claimed as glaucoma) is granted, and the rating for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine was increased to 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The Board determined that new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for glaucoma, and it was decided that the veteran's glaucoma is as likely as not incurred in active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his service-connected tension headaches and intermittent palsy of the left lateral rectus eye muscle, finding that neither condition warranted a higher evaluation based on the evidence provided.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2001
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to provide the veteran with an eye examination and obtain medical opinions regarding whether his current glaucoma and cataracts are related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The veteran is found to be in need of regular aid and attendance due to his multiple disabling conditions, which render him unable to protect himself from hazards or dangers incident to his daily environment on a regular basis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2001
The Board has determined that further development is required before the completion of appellate action, including providing notice to the veteran and his representative regarding their intent to appeal issues concerning right knee disability and glaucoma evaluations. The TDIU claim will be held in abeyance until these issues are resolved.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2001
The veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and records, including visual field testing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2001
The veteran's Parkinson's Disease and Glaucoma were not addressed at the time of the February 1999 VA aid and attendance/housebound examination. The RO is required to obtain medical records from Dr. R A. Velez Arce, review the claims file for compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, and provide a supplemental statement of the case if the benefit sought remains denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2001
The Board has determined that the case should be remanded due to new legal requirements and the need for additional medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The Board has denied the claims for service connection for glaucoma and cataract, finding that there was no evidence of treatment in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection for diabetes mellitus, glaucoma, and rhinitis/hay fever. The decision also addressed a previous grant of service connection for rhinitis/hay fever.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2001
The Board granted service connection for duodenal ulcer and disabilities of the eyes, including cataracts and glaucoma, due to mustard gas exposure. Service connection was denied for furunculosis, residuals of low back injury and ankylosing spondylitis, and residuals of rib fractures.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board found that the veteran does not have any current residuals from his inservice burns of the face and eyes, and therefore denied service connection for these conditions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.