Glaucoma decisions — 2012
131 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board found that the Veteran does not have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or eye disability (glaucoma and retinopathy) attributable to his period of active service, including exposure to herbicides. The claims were denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2012
The Veteran's glaucoma claim is denied as he does not have a current diagnosis.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus cannot be established as the condition was not present in service or within one year of separation, and there is no evidence linking it to service. The hypertension claim has been previously denied but reopened with new evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral primary open angle glaucoma as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected type 2 diabetes mellitus, finding that his glaucoma is at least as likely as not related to his diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Veteran's uveitis of the right eye with secondary glaucoma was rated at 30 percent prior to December 8, 2008 and at 50 percent from that date. The Board found that a higher rating is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disability is being remanded due to the need for an additional VA examination by an ophthalmologist who has not previously examined him. The examiner must consider the Veteran's exposure to chemicals and fumes from burning oil wells during his active duty in Southwest Asia, as well as his report of experiencing itchy eyes since his discharge in 1991.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran does not have glaucoma that is related to military service; his glaucoma was not caused or made worse by service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board has granted service connection for chronic bilateral optic atrophy and glaucoma, finding that the Veteran's disability is related to his active service. The issue of entitlement to a TDIU remains pending as it requires further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for his service-connected primary open angle glaucoma of both eyes is remanded due to the need for additional evidence and development, including a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting examinations to determine the nature and severity of his service-connected disabilities and whether they render him unable to obtain or maintain substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's appeal includes claims for service connection of various conditions, including bilateral cataracts and glaucoma, diabetes, low back pain pathology, hypertension, athlete's foot, and prostate cancer. The appeals are remanded to the Louisville, Kentucky RO for further development due to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has determined that additional evidentiary development is necessary prior to the adjudication of the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, including glaucoma. The case is REMANDED to obtain VA and private treatment records since August 2010, schedule the Veteran for an in-person VA examination, and readjudicate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for glaucoma and for a permanent and total disability rating for nonservice-connected pension purposes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an eye disorder, including as secondary to his service-connected Parkinson's disease, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2012
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left eye powder burn. The Veteran now meets the legal and factual criteria for service connection, as his current left eye conditions are causally related to his in-service injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran did not have any service connection claims pending at the time of his death for glaucoma, foot pain/plantar fasciitis, Dupuytren's contractures, meningitis, right rotator cuff problems, a right knee condition, cirrhosis with encephalitis and hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatitis B. As such, these claims are denied as accrued benefits.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2012
The Veteran withdrew his appeal of the issue of entitlement to service connection for cerebrovascular accident prior to a decision being made by the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board found that there is no evidence linking the Veteran's glaucoma of the left eye to his military service, and thus denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings for his bilateral glaucoma with diabetic retinopathy is being remanded due to procedural issues and the need to consider both sets of rating criteria.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a Travel Board hearing and issuance of a Statement of the Case on issues regarding timely substantive appeals filed with regard to January 2008 rating decisions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.