Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
243 vetted Board decisions in 2021.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the cause of the Veteran's left eye blindness. The Veteran claims that VA treatment caused his blindness, but there is conflicting evidence and further development is needed.
The Veteran's conditions, including degenerative spinal disease and degenerative disc disease, right eye glaucoma with traumatic cataract, and right thumb fracture with degenerative changes, have worsened since his last VA examinations. The Board has ordered a remand to obtain updated treatment records and conduct new VA examinations.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have prevented him from obtaining and maintaining a substantially gainful occupation since March 14, 2018.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's eye disability, specifically his claim for service connection. The examiner needs to provide a clear opinion on whether the Veteran's current eye disorders are related to an in-service injury or disease.
The Board has remanded the claims for hypertension, BPH, cervical spine disorder, lumbar spine disorder, bilateral hip disorders, neuropathies of any extremities, glaucoma and cataracts, and heart disorder due to inadequate examination opinions that did not consider the Veteran's work as a combat engineer in service.
The Veteran withdrew his appeals before the Board, effectively dismissing both claims for service connection for glaucoma and right ankle foot osteoarthritis.
The Board denied service connection for bilateral open angle glaucoma, bilateral cataracts, kidney disability, heart disability, right hip disability, and left hip disability. Service connection was granted for degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral pes planus, finding that the Veteran's pre-existing condition was aggravated by service. Service connection for left eye glaucoma is denied.
The Veteran's bilateral glaucoma was rated at 30 percent prior to July 31, 2019 and denied for higher ratings. From July 31, 2019 to October 20, 2020, the rating remained at 30 percent and was also denied for higher ratings. After October 20, 2020, the Veteran's glaucoma continued to be rated at 30 percent.
The Board has remanded the case for further development and readjudication due to potential eligibility for SMC under certain criteria. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are being evaluated in detail.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's bilateral eye condition, including cataracts and other related conditions. The VA is instructed to obtain a supplemental opinion from an appropriate examiner to determine if any current eye condition is causally or etiologically related to service.
The Board has remanded the case for a retrospective medical opinion to assess whether the Veteran required regular aid and attendance due to service-connected disabilities other than loss of use of both feet, specifically lung cancer, laryngeal cancer, lymphoma, diabetes, retinopathy, hearing loss, and tinea cruris.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's diagnosed eye disabilities, including glaucoma and cataracts.
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and other disabilities prevented him from obtaining and maintaining gainful employment since December 3, 2003. The TDIU claim is granted for the period from December 3, 2003 to January 31, 2016.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral eye disability, a rating in excess of 20 percent for left shoulder strain, synovitis, rotator cuff impingement syndrome, tendonitis, labral tear, and degenerative joint disease, and a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss due to inadequate medical opinions and outstanding VA treatment records.
The Veteran's hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and chronic headache disability are granted as service-connected due to in-service herbicide exposure.,Bladder cancer is denied as there is no evidence of the condition during or within one year after separation from active service. Peripheral neuropathy is also denied based on lack of evidence of onset during service or within a year post-separation.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral glaucoma and alcohol dependence in remission (claimed as anxiety and sleep problems). The Board found that there was no evidence of a current disability related to these conditions, and that any such disabilities were not incurred or aggravated by service.,The decision also noted that the Veteran did not submit sufficient evidence to support his claims for bilateral glaucoma and alcohol dependence in remission (claimed as anxiety and sleep problems).
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for bilateral eye disability, including glaucoma and cataracts, has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew his appeal prior to a hearing.
The Board has denied service connection for warts of the right elbow, left elbow, left shoulder, and right shoulder. The Veteran's warts are not considered to have begun during active service or be related to an in-service injury or disease.,Service connection for bilateral open angle glaucoma and hypertension is also denied as there is no evidence showing these conditions began during active service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury or disease.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for his bilateral eye disability, including primary open angle glaucoma, nuclear sclerotic cataract, and peripheral corneal degeneration. The medical opinion provided by the examiner found that these conditions are less likely than not related to any in-service event, injury, or illness.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.