Glaucoma Board decisions

The Board denied service connection for glaucoma, bilateral eye disability other than glaucoma, PTSD, residuals of a broken neck with vocal cord injury, and residuals of head injury.

The Board denied service connection for glaucoma, blepharitis, and allergic rhinitis as the evidence did not support a conclusion that these conditions were related to the veteran's active duty service.

The Board concluded that the preponderance of the evidence is against the veteran's claims for service connection for glaucoma, kidney stones, and bilateral hearing loss.

The Board denied service connection for a bilateral eye disability, to include glaucoma, as there was no credible evidence of an injury in service.

The Board denied service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, finding no competent medical evidence linking the veteran's current conditions to his military service.

The Board remands the case to obtain an opinion regarding whether the erectile dysfunction was aggravated by service-connected diabetes mellitus.

The appeal was dismissed due to the veteran's death.

The case is remanded for further development and readjudication of the veteran's claims.

The veteran's claims for increased rating and service connection were denied as the evidence did not support a higher disability rating or establish service connection.

The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for glaucoma is being remanded to schedule a VA examination.

The Board has determined that the veteran's glaucoma preexisted her military service and was not aggravated by it. The veteran's bilateral foot disorder, including pes planus and plantar warts, is presumed to have been aggravated by her military service. The veteran's hypertension does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation. The veteran's left knee osteoarthritis does not warrant an initial disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent.,The veteran's preexisting bilateral foot disorder was aggravated during active military service.

The veteran's glaucoma was not medically linked either directly to his military service or secondarily to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.

The Board denied the veteran's application to reopen a claim for service connection for residuals of a left eye injury, including glaucoma and pterygium, as new and material evidence was not received.

The Board denied service connection for dermatophytosis and macular degeneration and glaucoma, finding no evidence of a current disability or a link to service.

The veteran's claim for automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment only was denied as the evidence did not show that he had service-connected disability resulting in loss of use of at least one foot or a hand, or permanent impairment of vision in both eyes.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for glaucoma, finding no evidence of a nexus between the condition and his active service or any service-connected disability.

The Board denied an increased initial evaluation for the veteran's eye disability, evaluated as 10 percent disabling from August 6, 1991, 20 percent disabling from April 16, 1999, and 30 percent disabling from May 9, 1999.

The Board denied service connection for glaucoma, a chronic seizure disorder, and residuals of a head injury. The claim to reopen the back disability was not successful due to lack of new and material evidence.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a left eye disability and glaucoma of the right eye, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim for a left eye disability and that the glaucoma of the right eye was not incurred in or aggravated by service.

The veteran's claim for service connection for grand mal epilepsy was granted, but the glaucoma and back disability claims were denied.,The glaucoma claim was denied as there is no evidence linking it to service. The back disability claim was granted based on a history of treatment.