Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
4,809 vetted Board decisions for Glaucoma.
The Board has determined that the veteran's glaucoma is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II and herbicide exposure, granting the claim for service connection.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left eye injury and has determined that corneal scarring and glaucoma in the left eye are due to service injuries, granting service connection.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and reopening service connection were denied. The VA determined that the evidence did not meet the criteria for an increased rating or new and material evidence to reopen service connection.
The Board has dismissed the appeal for service connection of a bilateral shoulder condition. The claims for service connection of type II diabetes mellitus, glaucoma, and hypertension have been denied as these conditions are not related to military service.
The veteran's prostate cancer and glaucoma and other eye disorders were not found to be related to his military service, including exposure to Agent Orange or ultraviolet light from radar operations.
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for glaucoma with bilateral visual field impairment was granted, and he is currently rated at 30 percent disabling prior to October 6, 1989. The issue of a compensable evaluation for dermatophytosis of the feet remains unresolved.
The Board denied the motion to revise or reverse a December 2000 decision on the basis of clear and unmistakable error (CUE), finding that there was no CUE in the decision. The veteran's claim for service connection for glaucoma was received by VA in November 1984, resulting in initial payment of disability compensation as of that month.
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on need of regular aid and attendance or housebound status is denied as he does not meet the criteria for such benefits.
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection for a vision disability is denied as the earliest date received was July 26, 2002.
The veteran's initial combined rating for his left eye disabilities was denied, and the reduction from 40 percent to 30 percent was also denied.
The Board has found that the veteran's pigmentary glaucoma, bilaterally, is service connected as it originated during his military service and was seen with continued problems and treatment thereafter.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for kidney stones, residuals of a fracture of the 1st metatarsal of the right foot, residuals of right eye trauma, and glaucoma.
The Board denied compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for glaucoma, claimed as due to treatment at a VA hospital in 1955.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a right wrist disability and glaucoma on a direct or secondary basis to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
The Board has remanded the case due to the veteran's request for a hearing before the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The issues remain unresolved and need further review.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for effective dates earlier than October 11, 2002 for service connection of glaucoma in both eyes. The June 1953 rating decision denying left eye disability was found not to be clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records and the need for additional examinations.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and affording the veteran a VA examination to determine the etiology of any diagnosed eye disorders.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current disability for which service connection can be granted, and therefore, his claims are denied.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.