Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
4,809 vetted Board decisions for Glaucoma.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and needs additional examination regarding the onset of bilateral glaucoma during service.
The Board has remanded the case due to issues with visual field testing for diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, open angle glaucoma, and cataracts. The Veteran's claim is being returned for further development.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to obtain and maintain substantially gainful employment prior to June 14, 2016.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient opinions regarding whether the Veteran's vision impairment, including glaucoma and cataracts, is caused or aggravated by his service-connected coronary artery disease (CAD) and associated medications.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for additional development and examination, including obtaining private treatment records and a VA opinion on whether the Veteran's right eye disabilities were caused by or made worse by VA medical treatment.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is granted as due to herbicide exposure. The claims for glaucoma and erectile dysfunction secondary to diabetes mellitus are remanded.
The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to properly assess the Veteran's right eye conditions, as they may be related to service-connected traumatic brain injury. The claim will be remanded for this purpose.
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and TDIU is being remanded due to the failure to issue a Statement of the Case (SOC) in his initial rating decision.
The Board has determined that the AOJ failed to provide a proper VA examination for service connection of right eye conditions and SMC based on loss of use. The Veteran's contentions regarding in-service exposure to radar, CRT radiation, VHF, and microwave emissions are being reviewed by an ophthalmologist or optometrist.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, and related conditions have been rated at a 70 percent disability level since December 22, 2008. The Board has determined that he is entitled to a TDIU on an extraschedular basis from December 15, 2005, to December 22, 2008, and on a schedular basis thereafter.
The Board has remanded the issues of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for right and left eye disabilities due to a duty to assist error in obtaining an adequate VA examination prior to the July 2022 rating decision.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance due to a lack of evidence showing he is bedridden or in need of regular aid and assistance due to service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for urticaria has been reopened and granted. Service connection for hypertension is also granted due to herbicide agent exposure under the PACT Act.,Service connection for a back disability, glaucoma (secondary to DMII), stroke residuals, and neurological disability of the lower extremities (sciatica) are all remanded for further evaluation.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disorder due to unclear opinions and incomplete records. The Veteran is already service connected for left macular hole repair.
The Board has decided to remand the claims of service connection for residuals of an eye injury and glaucoma due to additional development being necessary.
The Veteran's eye conditions, including DES, cataracts, and EBMD, are found to be at least as likely as not caused by or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Veteran's claims for glaucoma, benign cyst, and dermatochalasis remain pending.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and duty-to-assist errors, requiring further development.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, gout, glaucoma, liver disease, hernia, and thyroid disability due to in-service exposure at Camp Lejeune. The claims are pending as new and material evidence was submitted by the Appellant.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a pancreas condition, prostate cancer, glaucoma, macular pigment change, and age-related cataract (claimed as latanoprost of the left eye), and diabetes mellitus due to duty assist errors. A VA medical opinion is needed regarding the etiology of these conditions.
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of an opinion regarding whether the Veteran's left eye disability, including glaucoma, was caused or aggravated by his service-connected hepatitis C and diabetes mellitus. The examiner is asked to provide opinions on these issues.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.