Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
4,274 vetted Board decisions in 2013.
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his bilateral hearing loss disability was denied. The current effective date is December 30, 2004.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss did not have onset during active service, was not caused by his active service, and did not manifest within one year of separation from active service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal of the claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss before a decision was made by the Board.
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his bilateral hearing loss is being remanded due to the need for clarification of private audiometric examination results and further development.
The Board found no evidence of an inner ear disability, hearing loss, or tinnitus being incurred in service and denied the Veteran's claims for these conditions.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for TBI, erectile dysfunction, bilateral hearing loss, a spine disability, and hypertension. The appeals were based on direct evidence rather than presumptive exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicides.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left knee disability, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus are related to his service. The evidence is at least as likely as not that these conditions were incurred during his military service.
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for lumbar strain was denied as his range of motion did not meet the criteria for a 10% rating under VA's General Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine.,Effective dates prior to November 19, 2005, were denied for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus as they were both granted effective on that date.
The Board found that the Veteran's claims of service connection were denied as there was no evidence linking his current conditions to his military service.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding his ability to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities. The case will be readjudicated after obtaining any outstanding treatment records.
The Board has determined that additional development is needed in order to make a determination on the Veteran's claims for service connection and increased rating. This includes obtaining pertinent VA treatment records, verifying combat experiences, and providing an opinion regarding the etiology of his hearing loss, knee disability, and lumbar strain.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including right ear hearing loss and carpal tunnel syndrome. The decision is final as it was not appealed.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for vertigo and a compensable disability evaluation for bilateral hearing loss were both denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not have a current ear disability manifested as vertigo or dizziness, and his hearing loss was not shown to be at least 10% disabling.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his in-service noise exposure, and service connection is granted for both conditions.
The Veteran's hip pain, hypertension, heart disorder, and sleep disorder were not found to be service-connected due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for Usher syndrome, finding that it is a genetic defect and not a disease. The superimposed hearing loss was already separately service-connected, and there was no evidence of vision impairment during service or otherwise related to service.
The Board has granted service connection for a bilateral hearing loss disability, finding that it is aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus. The claim for an increased rating for coronary artery disease remains pending and will be remanded.
The Veteran's hearing acuity is not shown to have been worse than Level II in the right ear and Level XI in the left ear at any point during the duration of this appeal, resulting in a noncompensable rating for bilateral hearing loss.
The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss was denied as his current level of disability does not warrant a rating greater than 10 percent.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining his complete service personnel records and a new VA addendum medical opinion.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.