Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 vetted Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for PTSD and hearing loss, as well as his TDIU claim, are being remanded due to the need for new examinations to assess current disability levels.
The Board has decided to remand the cases of bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus for further examination and opinion due to inadequate opinions in previous VA examinations.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, a right ankle disorder, and a left knee disorder due to inadequate examination opinions and lack of medical evidence.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there is no evidence of a nexus between his current conditions and his military service.
The Board has denied service connection for right ear hearing loss, finding that the Veteran's current condition is not related to his military service. The case is remanded for further action on the claim of service connection for sleep apnea.,Service connection for sleep apnea is also being remanded due to potential secondary service connection based on the presumptive exposure to burn pits and associated conditions.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to insufficient consideration of the Veteran's lay statements and medical literature, as well as new arguments submitted by his representative.
The Veteran is granted a TDIU and SMC at the housebound rate due to service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's service connection claims for bilateral hearing loss and cervical spine condition have been granted. The Board found that the Veteran had continuous symptoms since service, which is considered as continuity of symptomatology.
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and TDIU prior to March 16, 2020 is remanded due to the need for updated VA examinations.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions and failure to comply with previous remand instructions regarding the etiology of bilateral hearing loss.
The Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss is related to service exposure, and the Board has granted his claim for service connection.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that it did not have its onset in service and is not etiologically related to service.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss and entitlement to TDIU due to unclear symptomatology and insufficient income information.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence and a need for a new VA examination. The Veteran's hearing loss rating is being reviewed, and he must request an increased tinnitus rating on the appropriate form.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to incomplete development, and they will be reviewed again by the VA Regional Office.
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's conditions did not begin during his active duty service and are not otherwise etiologically related to his active duty service.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated as 0 percent disabling, and the Board finds that a compensable rating is not warranted.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for kidney disorder, bilateral hearing loss, bilateral eye disorder, and prostate cancer due to incomplete information from VA Forms 21-4142 submitted by the appellant.
The Veteran's appeals for various conditions and ratings have been withdrawn by his representative, resulting in the dismissal of all issues.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is caused or aggravated by his service-connected tinnitus.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.