Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Board has remanded the claims of bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to a duty-to-assist error. The Veteran's service treatment records from his prior period of service are needed for proper adjudication.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to receipt of additional evidence. The AOJ is instructed to attempt to obtain all relevant records and readjudicate the cases.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2019
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was not incurred in service and is not related to his active duty.,His right lower extremity, left lower extremity, and right arm/upper extremity peripheral neuropathies were not incurred in service and are not related to his active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's vertigo is caused or aggravated by his service-connected hearing loss and/or tinnitus.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the current disabilities are related to military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, specifically his vestibular disability, have rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment. As a result, the Board has granted a TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Veteran's attorney, B.A., is eligible for payment of fees from past-due benefits awarded in the June 2013 Board decision and effectuated in the August 2013 rating decision which granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and granted an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for lumbar spine DDD. The issue of reasonableness of attorney fees is remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to follow a substantially gainful occupation, and the Board finds that he meets the schedular requirement for TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are granted as service-connected, with the Board finding that these conditions are related to his in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Board has remanded the cases due to a need for new examinations and evaluations, particularly regarding the Veteran's left ear hearing loss.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Board has granted an earlier effective date of April 13, 2010 for the award of a 20 percent rating for bilateral hearing loss. The Veteran's claims for service connection for sinusitis, bilateral eye disorder, respiratory disorder, skin disorder, right knee disability, and right hip disability are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The claim for service connection has been reopened, but the issues of left knee disorder, bilateral hearing loss, lumbar spine disorder, right shoulder disorder, left foot disorder, and right foot disorder are remanded due to lack of a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to August 21, 2012, February 19, 2014, and February 19, 2014 are denied as there is no evidence of an informal claim or intent to file a claim before these dates.,The Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for left hip surgical scar and tinnitus are remanded due to the need for further development and consideration.,No effective date prior to February 19, 2014 is granted as there was no informal claim or intent to file a claim before this date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss. The issues of service connection for various conditions, including right rotator cuff condition, back condition, asbestosis, and knee conditions are remanded due to outstanding records.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that the Veteran's current hearing loss is related to his in-service noise exposure and resolving all doubt in his favor.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from obtaining and retaining substantially gainful employment, thus his TDIU claim is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including kidney cancer and spinal cancer, are remanded due to the need for additional medical records.,A decision on the issue of entitlement to SMC based on loss of use of both feet is inextricably intertwined with a decision on the issue of entitlement to service connection for paralysis from the chest down.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is found to have started during his military service and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's conditions are related to his military service due to exposure to excessive noise.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2019
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss has been rated as noncompensable since June 29, 2016. The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to his hearing acuity levels.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.