Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss has been rated as noncompensable. The Board found that the evidence did not support a compensable rating at any point during the period under review. For the left third finger distal interphalangeal contracture and keloid lesions, the Board remanded for further development including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling examinations to determine if these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate VA examination, and a new one must be conducted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and entitlement to TDIU as there is no evidence of a current disability or causation related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Board has denied service connection for heart disability, headache disability, sleep disability, acquired psychiatric disability, lumbar spine disability, bilateral foot disability, and bilateral hearing loss as there is no probative evidence of current disabilities. The claims are denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Board has granted service connection for low back disorder and bilateral ankle disorders, but denied service connection for right ear hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the evidence supports a finding of in-service noise exposure and continuity of symptoms since service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for essential tremor is granted.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability is remanded to determine if it is related to in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has remanded the cases due to insufficient rationale in the VA examiner's opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus. The examiner needs to consider research on delayed-onset hearing loss.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral hearing loss should be remanded due to inadequate opinion in the March 2019 VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 0 percent compensation for bilateral hearing loss has been denied. An earlier effective date prior to December 13, 2013, for the award of service connection for bilateral hearing loss has also been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for left ear hearing loss and service connection for a right ankle disorder are remanded due to the need for additional evidence and medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, but has remanded his claims for a back disability and diabetes mellitus due to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's previously denied claim for right ear hearing loss was not reopened. Service connection for myalgias (muscle pains) is granted as a presumptive condition due to Southwest Asia service. A rating of 30% for left shoulder bicipital tendonitis is granted effective August 22, 2017.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including hearing loss, lupus, heart disability, diabetes mellitus type II, peripheral neuropathy, and kidney disease are being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding exposure to herbicides.,Specifically, the RO must determine if the USS Frederick (LST-1184) was in the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of the Republic of Vietnam during service. If so, an addendum VA opinion will be obtained to assess the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, and chronic kidney disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hearing loss, finding that there was no evidence to support a relationship between his current hearing loss and his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to inadequate opinion regarding in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied because the new evidence submitted did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that there is no evidence of a current disability and that any hearing loss did not manifest within one year after separation from active duty. The Board also found that the Veteran's statements linking his service to his current hearing loss are not competent.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Board has granted the Veteran's petition to reopen his claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus. The claim for tinnitus is granted, while the claim for bilateral hearing loss is remanded due to insufficient evidence.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.